Shop
Regulatory Pulse

UK Expands SVHC Candidate List: 15 New Substances Now Under Supply Chain Scrutiny, What Body Art Professionals Must Know

PP

Chief Engineer

Patrick Poli

Journal Date

2026-03-27

Last Reviewed

2026-10-30

Two different 2026 updates, one shared duty, and one obligation that does not apply to UK studios

Key Takeaways:

» EU, 4 February 2026: ECHA added n-hexane and bisphenol AF (BPAF) to the REACH Candidate List, taking it to 253 entries [1]. n-hexane is notable as an SVHC identified on neurotoxicity under Article 57(f) rather than the usual CMR route.
» UK, 15 June 2026: the HSE added 15 substances to the UK REACH Candidate List, after a consultation that ran 9 March to 20 April 2026 [2]. This was the first substantive update since the end of the transition period.
» The shared duty: under Article 33, an article containing a Candidate List substance above 0.1% w/w carries a duty to answer a consumer request within 45 days, in both regimes [3].
» SCIP is not a UK duty. It comes from the EU Waste Framework Directive and applies to articles placed on the EU market [4][5]. A UK-only studio does not notify ECHA.
» Candidate List placement is not a ban and not a deadline. It creates information duties. Restriction or authorisation, if it ever follows, is a separate multi-year process.

SVHC notification triggers by studio activity for n-hexane and BPAF
SVHC notification triggers by studio activity

1. Do not merge the two lists

The EU and UK now run separate Candidate Lists, and the two 2026 updates were separate events with separate substances and separate dates. The most common error, one this article previously made itself, is to attribute the EU's n-hexane and BPAF addition to the UK.

EU REACHUK REACH
Updaten-hexane and BPAF added15 substances added
Date4 February 202615 June 2026
List size after253 entriessee the HSE list [2]
Consumer request dutyArticle 33, 45 daysArticle 33, 45 days
SCIP notificationYes, for articles on the EU marketNo equivalent duty

If you serve both markets, check both lists. Do not assume the UK set mirrors the EU set, and do not assume it differs either. The HSE publishes the UK Candidate List directly [2]; that page is the authority, not a summary of it.

2. What Article 33 actually requires

This is the duty that bites, and it is the same shape in both regimes. If an article you supply contains a Candidate List substance above 0.1% by weight, and a consumer asks, you have 45 days to give a written answer with enough information to allow safe use [3].

The threshold is binary. There is no small-studio proportionality argument. The practical consequence is not paperwork for its own sake: if you cannot answer because you never asked your supplier, the gap is already there.

The two substances worth asking your pigment and jewellery suppliers about:

n-Hexane (CAS 110-54-3) is a volatile solvent used in pigment synthesis, carrier formulation, and as a manufacturing cleaning agent. It does not appear on a finished ink label because it is a manufacturing residue rather than an ingredient. Ask for a residual solvent analysis. For reference, ICH Q3C classifies hexane as a Class 2 solvent with a permitted daily exposure of 2.9 mg/day and a concentration limit of 290 ppm [6]. That is a pharmaceutical benchmark, not a body art limit, and no body-art-specific residual solvent limit exists. It is still a reasonable number to quote when asking a supplier what they measure against.

Bisphenol AF (BPAF, CAS 1478-61-1) is classified toxic to reproduction (Repr. 1B) and is used as a cross-linking agent and process regulator in fluoroelastomers, specialty coatings and adhesives. In a body art supply chain the plausible routes are moulded plastic components and epoxy tooling that contacts product, rather than the ink or the jewellery itself.

3. SCIP: an EU duty, and not the one with the tonnage threshold

Two obligations get conflated here, and the previous version of this article conflated them.

SCIP is the ECHA database established under the EU Waste Framework Directive. Suppliers of articles containing a Candidate List substance above 0.1% w/w placed on the EU market must notify [4]. There is no tonnage threshold on SCIP, and because the Waste Framework Directive is EU law, there is no UK SCIP obligation [5]. A UK studio selling only into the UK does not notify ECHA.

REACH Article 7(2) is the separate one that carries the 1 tonne per year figure: a producer or importer of articles must notify ECHA where a Candidate List substance is present above 0.1% w/w and the total exceeds one tonne per year. That is a duty on producers and importers of articles, which most studios are not.

If you export finished articles into the EU, the SCIP question becomes live and belongs to whoever places the article on that market. Ask your supplier for their SCIP notification status rather than assuming it falls to you.

4. What Candidate List placement does and does not mean

Placement is an information trigger, not a countdown. A Candidate List substance may later be moved to the Authorisation List (Annex XIV) with a sunset date, or restricted under Annex XVII, but neither is automatic and neither is quick. Treat listing as a prompt to ask questions of your supply chain, not as a deadline to replace stock.

From the Chief Engineer's Workbench

Patrick Poli · 25+ years in body-jewellery manufacturing

the fork is a documentation problem, not a chemistry problem

In years of supplying body art manufacturers, I watched the UK follow EU chemical policy almost automatically. The post-Brexit divergence changes that, and I do not think most studios have absorbed what it means day to day.

The compliance infrastructure most studios built was designed around a single reference: one list, one questionnaire, one set of supplier answers. Two lists that update on different dates break that quietly, because nothing fails visibly. You only discover the gap when someone asks a question you cannot answer.

The practical answer is not to run two systems. Build your supplier documentation around the stricter requirement at each point, and let that be your single standard. It costs nothing extra in overhead and removes the dual-tracking problem. And keep the supplier's written answer on file, because under Article 33 your own good intentions are not the evidence, their confirmation is.

PPPatrick PoliChief Engineer · Creator of BioFlex® body jewelry

6. FAQ

Q: My studio is UK-only. Do I need to notify the SCIP database?
No. SCIP derives from the EU Waste Framework Directive and applies to articles placed on the EU market. There is no UK equivalent duty and no stated UK intention to introduce one. If you export articles into the EU, the duty attaches to whoever places them on that market, so ask your supplier for their notification status.

Q: How do I find out whether a pigment carries n-hexane residue above 0.1%?
Ask for a residual solvent analysis for the batch you stock. If the safety data sheet has no residual solvent data, ask what the supplier tests against. ICH Q3C's 290 ppm concentration limit for hexane is a pharmaceutical benchmark you can quote as a reference point, while being clear it is not a body art limit.

Q: Does a verbal question from a client in the studio start the 45-day clock?
Article 33 does not prescribe a format for the request, so treat a genuine consumer request as triggering the duty however it arrives. Prepare a short written template backed by your supplier confirmations, so answering costs you minutes rather than a scramble.

Q: The EU list has 253 entries. How many does the UK list have?
Check the HSE page rather than any summary, including this one. The UK list is maintained independently and the two update on different cycles, which is exactly why a number copied from an article ages badly.

Mind map · UK Expands SVHC Candidate List: 15 New Substances Now Under Supply Chain Scrutiny, What Body Art Professionals Must Know

  • UK REACH SVHC Candidate List
    • UK REACH SVHC Additions

      The UK Health and Safety Executive added fifteen chemicals to the UK REACH Candidate List on June 15, 2026.

      • Fifteen Substances Added
        • TBBPA Flame Retardant
        • DOTL Plastic Stabiliser
      • HSE Notification Obligation
        • One Tonne Annual Threshold
    • EU Candidate List Expansion

      The European Chemicals Agency expanded the SVHC Candidate List to 253 substances by adding n-hexane and Bisphenol AF on February 4, 2026.

      • Two Hazardous Chemicals
        • Neurotoxic n-Hexane Solvent
        • Reproductive Toxic Bisphenol AF
    • Tattoo Ink Restrictions

      The UK government decided to restrict hazardous substances in tattoo inks and permanent make-up under UK REACH on December 30, 2025.

      • Restricted Pigments
        • Pigment Blue 15:3
        • Pigment Green 7
      • Formulation Concentration Limits
        • Heavy Metal Controls
    • Body Art Compliance

      Body art studios must provide safe-use information automatically to professional recipients if articles contain substances of very high concern above 0.1%.

      • Article 33 Communication
        • Forty-Five Day Consumer Response
      • Studio Compliance Files
        • Current Safety Data Sheets
StructureProcessMaterialHazard

4 branches, 0 sources. Each branch cites the article it came from; the labels beneath it are names, not claims.

REACH Compliance Quiz

  1. 1. Under Article 33 of both EU and UK REACH, what is the statutory response deadline when a consumer asks about a Candidate List substance present in an article above 0.1% w/w?

    • ✓ 45 days — Article 33 explicitly mandates a 45-day window to provide consumers with written information sufficient to allow safe use.
    • • 30 days — While 30 days is common in other consumer regulations, REACH specifies a 45-day response window.
    • • 60 days — A 60-day response period exceeds the statutory timeframe established by Article 33.
    • • 90 days — Waiting 90 days would breach the statutory 45-day limitation set under REACH rules.
  2. 2. On what legal identification basis was n-hexane added to the EU REACH Candidate List in February 2026?

    • ✓ Neurotoxicity under Article 57(f) — n-Hexane was identified as a Substance of Very High Concern specifically due to neurotoxicity under Article 57(f) rather than the standard CMR route.
    • • Carcinogenicity, mutagenicity, or reproductive toxicity (CMR) under Article 57(a)-(c) — Although most substances enter the Candidate List via the CMR pathway, n-hexane was a notable exception listed for neurotoxic health effects.
    • • Persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) criteria under Annex XIII — n-Hexane was designated based on human health neurotoxicity rather than environmental PBT criteria.
    • • Endocrine disrupting properties under Article 57(f) — While endocrine disruptors can be listed under Article 57(f), n-hexane was listed specifically for neurotoxicity.
  3. 3. Which statement accurately reflects SCIP database obligations for a body art studio operating exclusively within the UK?

    • ✓ There is no UK SCIP obligation, so a UK-only studio does not notify ECHA. — SCIP derives from the EU Waste Framework Directive and applies only to articles placed on the EU market, with no UK equivalent requirement.
    • • UK studios must submit annual SCIP notifications if they import over one tonne of ink. — The one-tonne threshold belongs to REACH Article 7(2) notifications, not SCIP database reporting.
    • • UK studios using products containing Candidate List substances above 0.1% w/w must register on SCIP. — SCIP is an EU Waste Framework Directive requirement and does not apply to UK-only businesses.
    • • UK studios must report Candidate List substances to the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) via a UK SCIP portal. — The UK has not established a SCIP equivalent database or reporting portal for UK articles.
  4. 4. How does the notification threshold under REACH Article 7(2) differ from the EU SCIP notification duty?

    • ✓ Article 7(2) requires a total substance volume exceeding 1 tonne per year, whereas SCIP has no tonnage threshold. — Article 7(2) applies to article producers and importers when a Candidate List substance exceeds 0.1% w/w and 1 tonne per year total, while SCIP triggers strictly at >0.1% w/w regardless of volume.
    • • SCIP requires a 10 tonne per year minimum threshold, while Article 7(2) applies at any volume. — SCIP has no minimum volume threshold, whereas Article 7(2) requires reaching 1 tonne per year.
    • • Article 7(2) applies strictly to liquid mixtures, whereas SCIP applies exclusively to solid tools. — Both Article 7(2) and SCIP apply to articles rather than liquid mixtures.
    • • Both Article 7(2) and SCIP require exceeding a 1 tonne per year threshold alongside a 0.5% w/w concentration limit. — The concentration trigger for both rules is 0.1% w/w, and only Article 7(2) incorporates a 1 tonne per year threshold.
  5. 5. What is the immediate legal effect when a chemical is added to the REACH Candidate List?

    • ✓ It triggers information duties in the supply chain but does not ban the chemical or mandate stock replacement. — Candidate List placement is an information trigger under Article 33 rather than a sales ban or inventory deadline.
    • • It immediately prohibits the substance from being imported or sold on the market. — Inclusion on the Candidate List does not ban a substance; formal restriction or authorization processes are separate and multi-year.
    • • It sets a mandatory 12-month sunset date after which remaining stock must be safely destroyed. — Sunset dates apply to substances moved to the Authorisation List (Annex XIV), not those on the Candidate List.
    • • It automatically places the chemical under Annex XVII restriction within 45 days. — Annex XVII restrictions follow distinct, multi-year evaluation processes and are not automatic upon Candidate List addition.
  6. 6. Where is Bisphenol AF (BPAF) most plausibly found in a body art supply chain?

    • ✓ In moulded plastic components and epoxy tooling, rather than directly in inks or jewellery. — BPAF functions as a cross-linking agent and process regulator in fluoroelastomers, specialty coatings, and adhesives, making plastic tools and components the primary risk areas.
    • • As a primary organic carrier solvent in pre-dispersed pigment inks. — Solvents like n-hexane are associated with pigment synthesis and carriers, whereas BPAF is used in specialty polymers and coatings.
    • • As a surface coating electroplated onto titanium body jewellery. — BPAF is an organic fluorinated compound used in plastics and adhesives, not a metallic jewellery plating.
    • • As an active antiseptic agent in skin prep disinfectants. — BPAF is an industrial processing agent for synthetic rubbers and resins, not an active ingredient in skin disinfectants.
  7. 7. Why does n-hexane typically not appear on a finished tattoo ink ingredient label, even if residue remains?

    • ✓ It is a manufacturing cleaning agent or volatile solvent residue rather than an intentional formulation ingredient. — n-Hexane is used during pigment synthesis, carrier formulation, or equipment cleaning, making it a processing residue rather than an added ingredient.
    • • Concentrations under 1% are legally exempt from safety data sheet disclosures. — The REACH Article 33 disclosure trigger is 0.1% w/w, so a 1% exemption threshold does not exist.
    • • It breaks down fully into carbon dioxide and water upon exposure to air during mixing. — n-Hexane evaporates as a volatile organic solvent but leaves measurable residues rather than chemically breaking down.
    • • Chemical safety laws strictly prohibit printing solvent names on packaging delivered to end consumers. — Deliberately added ingredients must be declared; unadded processing residues do not appear on standard ingredient lists.
  8. 8. What concentration limit does the ICH Q3C guidance set for n-hexane as a Class 2 residual solvent?

    • ✓ 290 ppm — ICH Q3C classifies n-hexane as a Class 2 solvent with a concentration limit of 290 ppm and a permitted daily exposure of 2.9 mg/day.
    • • 1000 ppm — 1000 ppm corresponds to the general 0.1% w/w threshold under REACH, not the ICH Q3C benchmark for hexane.
    • • 50 ppm — 50 ppm is significantly lower than the 290 ppm pharmaceutical limit established in ICH Q3C.
    • • 10 ppm — 10 ppm is an inaccurate figure that does not reflect the 290 ppm pharmaceutical benchmark.
  9. 9. How should a UK studio respond to a verbal inquiry from a client regarding Candidate List substances in studio supplies?

    • ✓ Treat the verbal request as starting the Article 33 response clock and provide a written answer backed by supplier data. — Article 33 does not prescribe a specific format for consumer requests, meaning any genuine inquiry triggers the 45-day duty.
    • • Refuse to answer unless the consumer submits a formal, notarized written request. — Article 33 puts no formal formatting requirements on consumers making inquiries.
    • • Direct the client to contact the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) directly for product data. — Suppliers and distributors hold the legal duty under Article 33 to inform consumers directly upon request.
    • • Inform the client that Article 33 duties apply strictly to commercial B2B buyers rather than end consumers. — Article 33 explicitly grants rights to individual consumers as well as commercial supply chain partners.
  10. 10. True or False: The UK REACH Candidate List automatically adopts any new chemical added to the EU REACH Candidate List.

    • ✓ False — The UK and EU manage separate Candidate Lists on independent timelines and after distinct national consultation processes.
    • • True — Post-Brexit regulatory divergence means the UK HSE and EU ECHA maintain separate lists that do not automatically mirror each other.
  11. 11. What documentation practice is recommended for studios serving both UK and EU markets to manage post-Brexit regulatory divergence efficiently?

    • ✓ Build compliance tracking around the stricter requirement at each point to maintain a single standard. — Adopting the stricter benchmark across both regimes creates a single reliable compliance standard and eliminates dual-tracking gaps.
    • • Maintain two distinct, parallel compliance records and alternate checking them each month. — Running two separate systems creates overhead and increases the risk of unnoticed compliance gaps.
    • • Rely entirely on verbal assurances from suppliers to remain flexible across changing lists. — Article 33 compliance requires verifiable written documentation on file, making verbal assurances insufficient.
    • • Follow EU REACH exclusively, as EU regulations automatically override UK domestic rules. — EU law no longer overrides domestic UK legislation following the end of the transition period.

Extended Reference Table

8 of 8 rows

Extended reference table generated from the article and its verified research sources. Bracketed numbers jump to the matching entry in the Technical References below.

SafetyItem, Material, or Practice Standard or Regulation Technical Specification Requirement or Status Health Hazard or Benefit Source
✅Tattoo Inks and Permanent Make-Up (PMU)UK REACH Annex 17 / Appendix 13Specific safety-related disclosure and concentration limitsAdopted 30 December 2025; restricts placing on market and use in Great BritainReduces exposure to mutagens, carcinogens, and sensitisers
✅Tattoo Inks and Permanent Make-Up (PMU)REACH Annex XVII Entry 75Bans CMRs, irritants, and specific amines; mandates specific labelingIn force 4 January 2022 in the EUPrevents exposure to carcinogenic, mutagenic, or reprotoxic substances
✅Pigment Blue 15:3UK REACH / EU REACH Annex XVIIColor Index 74160; CMR Category 2Banned in EU (Jan 2023); restricted under UK REACH despite derogation requestsRisk of cancer, reproductive toxicity, and skin sensitization
✅Pigment Green 7UK REACH / EU REACH Annex XVIIColor Index 74260; Chlorinated Phthalocyanine GreenRestricted effective Jan 2023/2026 in EU; included in UK REACH restrictionRisk of skin sensitization, cancer, or long-term systemic effects
✅NickelREACH Annex XVII Entry 27 / GB MCLMigration limit 0.2 to 0.5 µg/cm ² /week; 200 ppm in inksIn force since 1994; mandatory allergen labeling required for trace amountsPrevents allergic sensitization and chronic skin reactions
✅Titanium JewelryUKAPP Membership Requirements / Industrial StandardsASTM F136 or ASTM F1295 (Implant grade)Must be verified with mill certificates for initial piercingsHigh biocompatibility; prevents allergic reactions and promotes healing
✅Polycyclic-aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH)UK REACH / EU REACH Entry 750.5 mg/kg total / 0.005 mg/kg benzo[a]pyreneMandatory limit for tattoo pigmentsMitigates high carcinogenic risk
✅Aromatic AminesUK REACH / EU REACH Entry 75Limit of 0.5 ppm (0.5 mg/kg) for azo cleavage productsRestricted in tattoo and PMU mixturesCategorized as CMR (carcinogenic, mutagenic, or toxic for reproduction)

Technical_References_Archive

About the Author

PP

Patrick Poli

Chief Engineer, Poli International · Creator of BioFlex® body jewelry

Patrick has spent 25+ years manufacturing body jewellery and studio equipment, and is the creator of BioFlex® body jewelry. He developed a thermal process to set stones into polymer without adhesive, because the glues available for the job contain cyanoacrylates. He also registered his own maker’s mark with the Sheffield Assay Office and produced a line in 18-karat gold, platinum, titanium and surgical steel.

More about Patrick →

Last reviewed: 2026-10-30 · Published: 2026-03-27

Related Tools & Reading

Continue Reading

EU SVHC List Hits 253: n-Hexane and BPAF Added in the February 2026 Update, What Body Art Professionals Must Know▶
Regulatory Pulse
🎧 Audio

EU SVHC List Hits 253: n-Hexane and BPAF Added in the February 2026 Update, What Body Art Professionals Must Know

ECHA added n-hexane and BPAF (a fluorinated bisphenol) to the SVHC Candidate List on February 4, 2026, bringing the total to 253 substances. For body art studios, the practical exposure is narrow - solvent residues in pigments and epoxy components in packaging - and neither substance is used in PP-R random copolymer, the chemistry behind BioFlex.

2026-08-09

Read Journal →
UK REACH Tattoo Ink Rules 2025: What Changed▶
Regulatory Pulse
🎧 Audio

UK REACH Tattoo Ink Rules 2025: What Changed

The UK government's 30 December 2025 decision on tattoo ink restrictions, published 15 January 2026, formally establishes UK REACH as a regulatory framework independent of EU REACH. Studios and suppliers must now verify compliance against UK-specific thresholds and timelines; "EU REACH compliant" is no longer automatically sufficient for UK distribution. Request written UK REACH compliance confirmation from suppliers, update batch tracking systems, and prepare for potential regulatory divergence on aromatic amine limits, heavy metal thresholds, and phase-in deadlines—all of which remain under UK specification and may differ from EU standards.

2026-03-25

Read Journal →
EU PFHxA Restriction in Tattoo Aftercare: What Studios and Artists Need to Know from October 10, 2026▶
Regulatory Pulse
🎧 Audio

EU PFHxA Restriction in Tattoo Aftercare: What Studios and Artists Need to Know from October 10, 2026

From October 10, 2026, EU law limits PFHxA and related PFAS in cosmetics, including most tattoo aftercare. What REACH entry 79 covers, what it does not, and what studios should do.

2026-10-17

Read Journal →