Two different 2026 updates, one shared duty, and one obligation that does not apply to UK studios
Key Takeaways:
» EU, 4 February 2026: ECHA added n-hexane and bisphenol AF (BPAF) to the REACH Candidate List, taking it to 253 entries [1]. n-hexane is notable as an SVHC identified on neurotoxicity under Article 57(f) rather than the usual CMR route.
» UK, 15 June 2026: the HSE added 15 substances to the UK REACH Candidate List, after a consultation that ran 9 March to 20 April 2026 [2]. This was the first substantive update since the end of the transition period.
» The shared duty: under Article 33, an article containing a Candidate List substance above 0.1% w/w carries a duty to answer a consumer request within 45 days, in both regimes [3].
» SCIP is not a UK duty. It comes from the EU Waste Framework Directive and applies to articles placed on the EU market [4][5]. A UK-only studio does not notify ECHA.
» Candidate List placement is not a ban and not a deadline. It creates information duties. Restriction or authorisation, if it ever follows, is a separate multi-year process.
1. Do not merge the two lists
The EU and UK now run separate Candidate Lists, and the two 2026 updates were separate events with separate substances and separate dates. The most common error, one this article previously made itself, is to attribute the EU's n-hexane and BPAF addition to the UK.
| EU REACH | UK REACH | |
|---|---|---|
| Update | n-hexane and BPAF added | 15 substances added |
| Date | 4 February 2026 | 15 June 2026 |
| List size after | 253 entries | see the HSE list [2] |
| Consumer request duty | Article 33, 45 days | Article 33, 45 days |
| SCIP notification | Yes, for articles on the EU market | No equivalent duty |
If you serve both markets, check both lists. Do not assume the UK set mirrors the EU set, and do not assume it differs either. The HSE publishes the UK Candidate List directly [2]; that page is the authority, not a summary of it.
2. What Article 33 actually requires
This is the duty that bites, and it is the same shape in both regimes. If an article you supply contains a Candidate List substance above 0.1% by weight, and a consumer asks, you have 45 days to give a written answer with enough information to allow safe use [3].
The threshold is binary. There is no small-studio proportionality argument. The practical consequence is not paperwork for its own sake: if you cannot answer because you never asked your supplier, the gap is already there.
The two substances worth asking your pigment and jewellery suppliers about:
n-Hexane (CAS 110-54-3) is a volatile solvent used in pigment synthesis, carrier formulation, and as a manufacturing cleaning agent. It does not appear on a finished ink label because it is a manufacturing residue rather than an ingredient. Ask for a residual solvent analysis. For reference, ICH Q3C classifies hexane as a Class 2 solvent with a permitted daily exposure of 2.9 mg/day and a concentration limit of 290 ppm [6]. That is a pharmaceutical benchmark, not a body art limit, and no body-art-specific residual solvent limit exists. It is still a reasonable number to quote when asking a supplier what they measure against.
Bisphenol AF (BPAF, CAS 1478-61-1) is classified toxic to reproduction (Repr. 1B) and is used as a cross-linking agent and process regulator in fluoroelastomers, specialty coatings and adhesives. In a body art supply chain the plausible routes are moulded plastic components and epoxy tooling that contacts product, rather than the ink or the jewellery itself.
3. SCIP: an EU duty, and not the one with the tonnage threshold
Two obligations get conflated here, and the previous version of this article conflated them.
SCIP is the ECHA database established under the EU Waste Framework Directive. Suppliers of articles containing a Candidate List substance above 0.1% w/w placed on the EU market must notify [4]. There is no tonnage threshold on SCIP, and because the Waste Framework Directive is EU law, there is no UK SCIP obligation [5]. A UK studio selling only into the UK does not notify ECHA.
REACH Article 7(2) is the separate one that carries the 1 tonne per year figure: a producer or importer of articles must notify ECHA where a Candidate List substance is present above 0.1% w/w and the total exceeds one tonne per year. That is a duty on producers and importers of articles, which most studios are not.
If you export finished articles into the EU, the SCIP question becomes live and belongs to whoever places the article on that market. Ask your supplier for their SCIP notification status rather than assuming it falls to you.
4. What Candidate List placement does and does not mean
Placement is an information trigger, not a countdown. A Candidate List substance may later be moved to the Authorisation List (Annex XIV) with a sunset date, or restricted under Annex XVII, but neither is automatic and neither is quick. Treat listing as a prompt to ask questions of your supply chain, not as a deadline to replace stock.


