Poli Data · Updated July 2026

Free Body-Art Safety Charts You Can Embed

13 sourced data visualisations on nickel allergy, piercing safety, jewellery materials, tattoo removal and EU regulation. Every chart links to its primary source. Free to embed on your own site with attribution, under CC BY 4.0.

We build these charts from peer-reviewed studies and EU regulatory texts for our own safety references and tools. They are free for journalists, educators, studios and researchers to reuse. Each chart has a one-click embed: paste the snippet and it stays current, because it renders live from this site. Grouped by topic below, or browse the interactive widget gallery to preview and filter them live.

Need a chart we do not have yet, or the underlying numbers as a dataset? Email info@poliinternational.com and we will help.

Nickel & allergy

Nickel sensitisation by group

Nickel is the single most common contact allergen, and prevalence is several times higher in women than in men (unselected general-population data, Glostrup).

Nickel sensitisation by groupNickel is the single most common contact allergen, and prevalence is several times higher in women than in men (unselected general-population data, Glostrup).Men (general population)2.2%Women (general population)11.1%Overall (patch-test meta-analysis)11.4%

Source: Nielsen & Menné; Alinaghi et al. (PubMed)

Full context: Nickel Allergy Statistics
Nickel allergy prevalence in Europe

Nickel is the most common contact allergen. The EU Nickel Directive measurably cut prevalence in young women.

Nickel allergy prevalence in EuropeNickel is the most common contact allergen. The EU Nickel Directive measurably cut prevalence in young women.Children & adolescents8–10%Women 18–35 (after Nickel Directive)11.4%General adult population8–19%Women 18–35 (before Nickel Directive)19.8%

Source: Ahlström et al., nickel allergy review (PubMed)

Full context: Body Art Safety Statistics

Materials

Nickel content of common body-jewellery materials (% by weight)

Implant-grade titanium and non-metallic polymers carry effectively no nickel; stainless steel relies on a passive layer to stay compliant; nickel-silver alloys are unsuitable for piercings.

Nickel content of common body-jewellery materials (% by weight)Implant-grade titanium and non-metallic polymers carry effectively no nickel; stainless steel relies on a passive layer to stay compliant; nickel-silver alloys are unsuitable for piercings.BioFlex® polymer0%ASTM F136 titanium~0%ASTM F138 316LVM steel10–14%Nickel silver~18%

Source: ASTM F136 / F138; Thyssen et al. (PubMed)

Full context: Body Jewelry Materials & Allergy Statistics
Nickel content by weight, common body-jewellery materials

Implant-grade titanium and BioFlex® PP-R are effectively nickel-free; 316L surgical steel is a nickel-bearing alloy that relies on a passive layer to stay within release limits.

Nickel content by weight, common body-jewellery materialsImplant-grade titanium and BioFlex® PP-R are effectively nickel-free; 316L surgical steel is a nickel-bearing alloy that relies on a passive layer to stay within release limits.Implant-grade titanium (ASTM F136)≈0%BioFlex® PP-R polymer0%316L surgical steel10–15%

Source: ScienceInsights; Poli International — BioFlex®

Full context: Implant-Grade Material Statistics
Gingival recession by oral-jewellery material

The material left against the gum drives the damage. Rigid metals caused several times more recession than flexible polymer in a scoping review of oral piercing.

Gingival recession by oral-jewellery materialThe material left against the gum drives the damage. Rigid metals caused several times more recession than flexible polymer in a scoping review of oral piercing.Flexible polymer (Teflon)9%Stainless steel23.5%Titanium52.9%

Source: Malcangi et al., Oral Piercing review (PMC)

Full context: Piercing Complications Statistics

Piercing safety

Reported piercing complication rates

Ranges vary by study site and method. Non-earlobe and cartilage sites carry the highest rates.

Reported piercing complication ratesRanges vary by study site and method. Non-earlobe and cartilage sites carry the highest rates.ED visits associated with infection13%University cohort (any complication)17%Non-earlobe sites23%Systematic-review upper estimate30–35%

Source: PubMed / StatPearls (NIH)

Full context: Body Art Safety Statistics
Minor infection rate, cartilage vs soft-tissue piercings

Ear cartilage is avascular and heals slowly, so infections there are both more frequent and more serious (study of 1,200 piercing sites).

Minor infection rate, cartilage vs soft-tissue piercingsEar cartilage is avascular and heals slowly, so infections there are both more frequent and more serious (study of 1,200 piercing sites).Soft-tissue (lobe) piercings21%Cartilage piercings30%

Source: Simplot & Hoffman, Am J Otolaryngol (PubMed)

Full context: Piercing Complications Statistics
Piercing complication rate by site

Complications cluster in the slow-healing cartilage and navel placements, well above the all-sites baseline.

Piercing complication rate by siteComplications cluster in the slow-healing cartilage and navel placements, well above the all-sites baseline.All sites (baseline)17%Non-earlobe23%Cartilage / navel30–35%

Source: StatPearls, body piercing complications (NCBI)

Full context: Tattoo Aftercare & Healing Statistics

Regulation

Nickel allergy in women 18–35, before vs after the EU Nickel Directive

Limiting how much nickel an item may release, rather than how much it contains, cut prevalence by roughly a third in the most-exposed group. Enforcement is the remaining gap: about a quarter of earring posts still exceeded the limit in a 2025 review.

Nickel allergy in women 18–35, before vs after the EU Nickel DirectiveLimiting how much nickel an item may release, rather than how much it contains, cut prevalence by roughly a third in the most-exposed group. Enforcement is the remaining gap: about a quarter of earring posts still exceeded the limit in a 2025 review.Before the Directive19.8%After the Directive11.4%▼ 8.4 pts lowerEarring posts still over the limit (2025)24.7%

Source: Ahlström et al.; von Spreckelsen et al. (PubMed / PMC)

Full context: Nickel Allergy Statistics
REACH nickel-migration limits (µg/cm²/week)

Jewellery worn in a fresh piercing must meet a limit more than twice as strict as the general skin-contact rule, because a healing channel is an open wound.

REACH nickel-migration limits (µg/cm²/week)Jewellery worn in a fresh piercing must meet a limit more than twice as strict as the general skin-contact rule, because a healing channel is an open wound.Post inserted in a healing piercing0.2Any other prolonged skin-contact item0.5

Source: Jewellery metal-content rules (Business Companion)

Full context: REACH Body Art Regulation Statistics
REACH heavy-metal content limits for jewellery (ppm)

Cadmium and lead each carry their own Annex XVII restriction, applied to every individual part of an item rather than an average across the piece.

REACH heavy-metal content limits for jewellery (ppm)Cadmium and lead each carry their own Annex XVII restriction, applied to every individual part of an item rather than an average across the piece.Cadmium (Entry 23)100 ppmLead (Entry 63)500 ppm

Source: Jewellery metal-content rules (Business Companion)

Full context: REACH Body Art Regulation Statistics

Tattoo removal

Estimated laser sessions by Kirby-Desai score

The gap between a 3-session and a 15-session clearance is driven by the physical properties of the ink, skin and laser, not by marketing claims.

Estimated laser sessions by Kirby-Desai scoreThe gap between a 3-session and a 15-session clearance is driven by the physical properties of the ink, skin and laser, not by marketing claims.Score < 4 (simple black, fair skin)1–3Score 5–9 (single-colour pro)4–6Score 10–14 (dense multicolour)7–10Score > 15 (cover-up, dark skin)15+

Source: Kirby & Desai, Kirby-Desai scale (PubMed)

Full context: Tattoo Removal Statistics 2026

Industry

Distribution of non-earlobe piercing sites

Ear and nose dominate non-earlobe piercings; the slower-healing cartilage, oral and surface sites are where jewellery material choice most affects the outcome.

Distribution of non-earlobe piercing sitesEar and nose dominate non-earlobe piercings; the slower-healing cartilage, oral and surface sites are where jewellery material choice most affects the outcome.Ear (non-lobe)46%Nose27%Lip12%Eyebrow9%

Source: Laumann & Derick, JAAD (PubMed)

Full context: Body Art Industry & Market Statistics

Licensing & attribution

All Poli Data charts are released under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. You may embed, reproduce or adapt them, including commercially, provided you credit Poli International with a link back to the source page. The embed snippets do this automatically. Every underlying figure links to its primary peer-reviewed or regulatory source, so you can verify and cite the original.

For a custom chart, the raw dataset, or expert comment from a body-art material specialist, contact info@poliinternational.com.