Shop
Market Pulse

Tattoo Demand Is Still Climbing – But The Real Money Is Moving By Geography

PP

Chief Engineer

Patrick Poli

Journal Date

2026-08-19

Last Reviewed

2026-10-03

Why Studio Growth Now Depends On Where, Not Whether, Demand Is Rising

Key Takeaways:
» Global tattoo services are on a 7–10% annual growth track through 2033, but growth is uneven by region.
» The U.S. market is mature and competitive; Europe and Asia-Pacific are where incremental studio revenue will come from.
» Asia-Pacific (especially Southeast Asia) is moving into double‑digit CAGR territory, outpacing global averages and changing travel tattoo economics.
» Temporary and cosmetic tattoo segments are growing faster than traditional flash/custom work and pulling different client demographics.
» Commercially, the next 12 months are about choosing the right geography and segment focus, then pricing and staffing to that demand curve.

---

Infographic: Tattoo Demand Is Still Climbing But The Real Money Is Moving By
Infographic: Tattoo Demand Is Still Climbing But The Real Money Is Moving By

1. The Demand Curve: Still Up, But No Longer Flat Across Markets

Across the recent market reports, one thing is consistent: tattoo demand globally is not plateauing; it’s compounding. Multiple research houses now pin global tattoo market growth in the 7–10% CAGR band through the late 2020s and early 2030s, with forecasts pushing total market value roughly 2x by the early 2030s compared with mid‑2020s baselines. That’s not hype – it’s a reflection of tattoos moving from subculture to mainstream consumption, especially in urban middle‑income segments and among women and professionals who would have been “off‑limits” twenty years ago.

The gap is in the numbers underneath the headlines. Some analysts size the “tattoo market” narrowly as services only (studio revenue), others bundle in equipment and aftercare. One recent global tattoo product market study pegs that product segment alone at USD 4.25 billion in 2025, rising to USD 6.5 billion by 2035 at 4.3% CAGR, which is slower than service‑side growth but still meaningful. That tells you where margin lives: services grow faster, consumables grow steadily, and branding plus distribution decide who captures that consumable CAGR. For studios, the product number is a proxy for how much leverage exists in upselling clients into aftercare, jewellery upgrades, and cosmetic add‑ons rather than relying purely on needle time.

Then there’s the U.S. specifically. Industry data for Tattoo Artists in the U.S. puts the 2026 service market around USD 1.3 billion in studio revenue, with historical growth around 10.9% CAGR from 2020–2025. That’s very healthy, but it’s also where competition is fiercest and consolidation across supply is accelerating – a dynamic I covered when looking at U.S. tattoo supply consolidation as the commercial story to watch in a previous briefing on distribution power shifts in the American market.

From a commercial point of view, the takeaway is simple: global growth is strong, but your margin will depend on which geographic slice you choose and how exposed you are to saturated urban U.S. markets versus under‑served growth corridors. The money is not evenly spread.

---

2. Where Demand Is Outrunning The Average: Europe vs Asia-Pacific

The fresh intelligence gets more interesting when you split the map.

Recent analysis from multiple firms suggests:

- Global tattoo services: broadly 7–10% CAGR to 2033–2035.
- Europe: steady growth, with one forecast showing Europe’s tattoo market growing from about USD 0.81 billion in 2025 to USD 0.88 billion in 2026—a modest single‑year increase but part of a longer trend of normalization and higher spend per session.
- Asia-Pacific: faster lane. One detailed report has Asia-Pacific at roughly 23% of global tattoo market revenue in 2024, with a 12.6% CAGR from 2024 to 2031, materially ahead of the global average.

On top of that, you have segment‑specific data: Southeast Asia’s temporary tattoo market alone clocked about USD 18.32 million in 2024 with a 12.6% CAGR to 2031, outpacing broader regional beauty segments. Temporary is not your bread‑and‑butter as a professional studio owner, but it is a leading indicator of tattoo comfort, skin decoration as fashion, and future conversion into permanent work, particularly in markets like Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia where young clients test looks before committing.

Put simply: the demand slope is steeper in Asia-Pacific, and particularly in Southeast Asia, than in the U.S. or Western Europe. That matters if you’re deciding where to open a second studio, which distributor network to plug into, or whether to develop regional pricing strategies tailored to tourism‑heavy versus domestic‑heavy markets. A studio in Bangkok sitting on foot traffic from Korean, Japanese, European, and U.S. tourists is playing a very different game than a small town shop in Ohio, even if both are on the same 8–10% global growth curve on paper.

Here’s a simplified view of how the current intelligence lines up:

FeatureU.S. Tattoo ServicesAsia-Pacific Tattoo Services
Recent CAGR (services)~10% (2020–2025)~12.6% (2024–2031)
Market maturityMature, high competition, strong brandingGrowth stage, fragmented, many independents
Price pressureHigh; consolidation in supply squeezing studio marginsMixed; price ceiling lower but demand volume rising
Tourism dependenceModerate; city‑focusedHigh in hubs like Bangkok, Phuket, Bali, Tokyo
Upsell potential (aftercare / jewellery)Strong, but crowded supplier fieldStrong if you can source certified products and educate clients
Regulatory predictabilityHigher, but increasingly strictVariable; some markets tightening, others still informal

Against that backdrop, your commercial decisions for the next 12 months should assume Asia-Pacific grows faster in both volume and client willingness to spend on body art, while the U.S. and Western Europe focus more on share of wallet per client and brand differentiation. That ties directly into the studio business economics I discussed in depth in the earlier piece on U.S. tattoo supply consolidation and how distributor power reshapes studio margins – what’s different now is the geographic angle.

---

3. Numbers That Matter in Practice: What They Mean For Booking, Pricing, and Expansion

Let’s strip the noise and look at the working numbers:

- Global tattoo services and products: CAGR in the high single to low double digits (7–10%+) through early 2030s, with most forecasts converging on a roughly 2x market size between mid‑2020s and early‑2030s.
- Tattoo products (inks, needles, machines, aftercare): 4.3% CAGR from 2026–2035, implying a slower but stable climb in consumable volume.
- U.S. service market: about USD 1.3 billion in 2026, sitting inside a broader U.S. “tattoo industry” revenue estimate around USD 4.2–4.8 billion when you include cosmetic tattooing and removal.
- Asia-Pacific share: ~23% of global tattoo revenue in 2024, growing faster than the rest of the world at 12.6% CAGR, meaning that slice expands materially over the rest of the decade.
- Temporary/cosmetic segments: 7.6%+ CAGR globally for temporary tattoos and similar skin decoration products, with online channels accelerating uptake.

For a studio owner or distributor, you don’t spend your week arguing about CAGR; you care about chair utilisation, booking lead times, and cost per booked hour. Translating:

- A 10% annual demand growth in a mature city with limited chair capacity will show up as harder booking, more weekend bottlenecks, and pressure to either raise prices or extend hours.
- A 12–13% demand ramp in a growing corridor (say Bangkok, Ho Chi Minh City, or Jakarta) with high tourism churn will feel like more walk‑ins, more short‑notice bookings, and a stronger case for tiered pricing (local vs tourist, small vs large pieces) and multi‑language front‑desk capacity.
- A 4.3% product CAGR means your consumables usage grows modestly with volume, but price increases from suppliers and freight will now decide whether your margin per tattoo actually tracks the service revenue growth, or gets quietly eaten.

Crudely, if your studio revenue is USD 500k/year, a 10% growth environment adds about USD 50k in top line if you hold share. The question is whether your ink, needle, and furniture bill climbs by 4–8% quietly in the background, and whether your rent and labour outrun that gain. That’s why understanding global market sizing and forecasts for tattoo and piercing services is not academic – it’s your early‑warning system for when demand outpaces your capacity planning and your supplier terms. The more demand moves towards Asia-Pacific, the more you’ll see pricing power shift to studios that can serve tourists well and plug into regional distribution networks for certified products, rather than relying solely on imports stripped of margin by intermediaries.

---

4. Patrick’s Note: The Question He Asks And Answers

The question I keep asking is simple: if tattoo demand is growing everywhere, why do some studios feel squeezed instead of buoyant? The answer is that growth is not evenly shared, and the studios that win are the ones that align their economics with their geography, not just their artistic vision. A shop in central Paris on a slow Monday with strong weekend demand should not use the same pricing and staffing logic as a high‑volume, tourist‑driven studio in Phuket, yet I routinely see identical booking policies and consumable purchasing patterns in both.

What the data doesn’t tell you is what happens at the invoice level. When I look at studio orders across the UK, France, and Thailand, the pattern is consistent: those who treat growth forecasts as a signal to renegotiate distributor terms and rebalance their consumable mix make more money than those who just “work more hours”. If you’re sitting in a market benefiting from the Asia-Pacific 12.6% CAGR trajectory, your leverage is not just more tattoos – it’s using that volume to demand better pricing and rebates from your suppliers on needle systems matched to high‑throughput work and inks that minimise rework, exactly the logic I laid out when breaking down the relationship between needle taper angle and dermal cellular regeneration speed in another Poli Journal piece on trauma and recovery. Growth amplifies good economics and punishes lazy ones.

---

5. FAQ: Technical Q&A

Q: I run a mid‑size studio in the U.S. – does this global growth mean I should plan a second location now?
If your local market looks like the national picture (solid demand, but high competition and rising costs), treat global growth as a caution, not a green light. Expand only if your current studio consistently runs near 80–90% chair utilisation at peak times, your waiting list is measurable in weeks, and your consumable margin is already protected through negotiated supply. Otherwise, the smarter play is to raise prices modestly, tighten scheduling, and improve upsell on aftercare and jewellery before adding fixed overhead.

Q: I’m a European distributor – is it worth building a dedicated line for Southeast Asia now or wait?
With Asia-Pacific sitting on double‑digit CAGR, waiting risks ceding the market to local players who understand tourism flows and regulatory nuance. The commercial logic supports piloting a lean regional operation now, focused on high‑margin certified jewellery and aftercare, while using existing European infrastructure for core inventory. Structure contracts with studios to reflect local purchasing power and focus on volume plus training support, not just price.

Q: For a studio in Thailand or Vietnam, how should I adjust pricing to match tourism‑driven demand?
Price in tiers: keep a sustainable, accessible rate for domestic clients, then set premium tourist pricing for walk‑ins and large custom pieces, reflecting the higher willingness to pay from visitors. Combine that with minimum booking sizes in peak seasons and a clear distinction between quick flash work and longer sessions, so tourist demand doesn’t crowd out local regulars. Ensure your supply chain (inks, needles, jewellery) is robust and certified – the reputational damage of a single high‑profile complication from a tourist client travels much faster than your revenue.

---

Conclusion: Put Geography Into Your Next 12-Month Plan

The commercial story underneath the recent tattoo market numbers is straightforward: demand is rising globally, but the real upside now sits in choosing the right geography and segment focus, then structuring studio and supply contracts to capture that growth instead of being crushed by it. For U.S. and Western European studios, the next year is about tightening pricing, improving upsell, and defending margin against consolidation in supply, building on the same logic discussed in the earlier briefing on U.S. tattoo supply consolidation as the commercial story to watch and how distributor power shapes invoice‑level economics.

For studios and distributors in or near Asia-Pacific, the play is more aggressive: lean into the 12%+ CAGR corridor, design tourism‑aware pricing and booking structures, and use volume to rewrite supplier terms rather than accepting off‑the‑shelf deals designed for slower‑growth markets. Either way, the decision at the end of this briefing should be concrete: audit your geography, recut your pricing, and revisit your supplier agreements within the next quarter, so the global demand curve works for you, not just for the people publishing charts.

---

Further Reading

  • U.S. Tattoo Supply Growth Is Slowing, but the Tariff Reset Is What Changes Buyer Behavior
  • U.S. Tattoo Demand Is Still Growing, But the Money Is Moving Through Imports, Not Studios
  • U.S. tattoo supply consolidation is the commercial story to watch now
  • Mind map · Tattoo Demand Is Still Climbing – But The Real Money Is Moving By Geography

    • Global Tattoo Market Shifts
      • Compounding Global Demand

        Global tattoo services are growing in the seven to ten percent annual range with market value doubling by the early 2030s.

        • Mainstream Consumer Shift
        • Steady Consumables Growth
      • Asia-Pacific Rapid Growth

        Tattoo services in the Asia-Pacific region are expanding at a twelve point six percent annual growth rate through 2031.

        • Southeast Asia Lead
          • Thailand Tourism Hubs
          • Indonesia Market Rise
        • High Tourism Churn
      • Saturated Western Markets

        The mature United States tattoo service market reaches about one point three billion dollars in 2026 amidst fierce competition.

        • Mature US Services
        • Steady Europe Expansion
      • Alternative Tattoo Segments

        Temporary tattoo segments are projected to grow globally at a seven point six percent annual rate to attract diverse demographics.

        • Temporary Skin Decoration
        • Cosmetic Procedures Expansion
          • Semi-Permanent Makeup
          • Medical Restoration
      • Studio Expansion Caution

        Studio owners should expand to new locations only when peak chair utilization consistently reaches eighty to ninety percent.

        • Chair Utilization Baseline
        • Protecting Consumable Margins
    StructureProcessMaterialHazard

    5 branches, 0 sources. Each branch cites the article it came from; the labels beneath it are names, not claims.

    Tattoo Quiz

    1. 1. According to recent market reports cited in the text, how does the projected CAGR of the global tattoo product market compare to that of the global tattoo services market?

      • • Tattoo products are projected to grow faster at 10.9% CAGR, while services grow at 4.3% CAGR. — This transposes the growth rates, as 10.9% represents historical U.S. service growth while products grow at 4.3%.
      • ✓ Tattoo products are projected to grow at 4.3% CAGR, whereas services are on a 7–10% annual growth track. — The text explicitly pegs global product segment growth at 4.3% CAGR from 2026 to 2035, compared to 7–10% for global service growth.
      • • Both tattoo products and tattoo services are projected to grow at an identical rate of 12.6% CAGR. — The 12.6% figure applies specifically to Asia-Pacific service market growth, not the global product segment.
      • • Tattoo products are projected to decline by 4.3% CAGR as service growth accelerates to double digits. — The source notes positive growth of 4.3% for products rather than a market contraction.
    2. 2. What share of global tattoo market revenue did Asia-Pacific account for in 2024, and what is its projected CAGR from 2024 to 2031?

      • • Approximately 15% of global revenue with a 7–10% CAGR. — This underestimates the Asia-Pacific market share and matches its growth rate to the general global service average.
      • ✓ Approximately 23% of global revenue with a 12.6% CAGR. — Data in the text highlights that Asia-Pacific held roughly 23% of global tattoo revenue in 2024 and is projected to expand at a 12.6% CAGR through 2031.
      • • Approximately 35% of global revenue with a 4.3% CAGR. — This overstates regional share while confusing the regional service expansion rate with global product segment growth.
      • • Approximately 50% of global revenue with a 10.9% CAGR. — This drastically overstates market share and substitutes historical U.S. studio growth rates for Asia-Pacific projections.
    3. 3. What is the estimated studio service revenue for U.S. tattoo artists in 2026, and what was the historical CAGR from 2020 to 2025?

      • • USD 0.88 billion studio revenue with an 8.1% historical CAGR. — This reflects European market projections rather than U.S. service metrics.
      • ✓ USD 1.3 billion studio revenue with a 10.9% historical CAGR. — Industry data cited in the briefing places U.S. studio service revenue at USD 1.3 billion in 2026 following a 10.9% CAGR from 2020 to 2025.
      • • USD 4.25 billion studio revenue with a 4.3% historical CAGR. — This confuses total global product market projections with U.S. studio service revenue.
      • • USD 6.5 billion studio revenue with a 12.6% historical CAGR. — This references 2035 global product market forecasts combined with Asia-Pacific service growth rates.
    4. 4. When including cosmetic tattooing and removal alongside traditional services, what is the total estimated annual revenue range for the broader U.S. tattoo industry around 2026?

      • • USD 0.81 to 0.88 billion — This figure describes the total European tattoo market revenue between 2025 and 2026.
      • • USD 1.3 to 1.8 billion — This range is too narrow and represents pure studio service revenue alone.
      • ✓ USD 4.2 to 4.8 billion — The text clarifies that when cosmetic tattooing and tattoo removal are bundled into U.S. industry figures, total revenue reaches USD 4.2–4.8 billion.
      • • USD 6.5 to 10.0 billion — This overstates the broader U.S. valuation and blends in long-term global product projections.
    5. 5. What was the market size of Southeast Asia's temporary tattoo segment in 2024, and why is this market commercially relevant to studio owners?

      • ✓ USD 18.32 million; it serves as a leading indicator of growing comfort with body art and skin decoration as fashion. — The source identifies this market size for 2024 (at 12.6% CAGR) and explains that temporary tattoos show client willingness to test looks before permanent conversion.
      • • USD 1.3 billion; it directly generates the majority of revenue for traditional brick-and-mortar tattoo shops. — This confuses temporary regional product revenue with total U.S. studio service revenue.
      • • USD 0.81 billion; it represents a decline in client demand for permanent custom work across urban centers. — The source presents temporary work as a complementary gateway to permanent tattooing rather than a cause of market decline.
      • • USD 4.25 billion; it forces local regulators to tighten sanitary laws across the entire region. — This misquotes global product market totals and invents regulatory consequences not mentioned in the text.
    6. 6. What does the projected 4.3% CAGR for tattoo products (inks, needles, machines, aftercare) from 2026 to 2035 imply for studio profit margins?

      • • Product supply costs will drop automatically due to rapid overproduction by consolidation partners. — The text notes that supply consolidation and distributor power are increasing price pressures rather than reducing supply costs.
      • ✓ Consumable usage will grow modestly, but supplier price hikes and freight costs can quietly erode margins if unmanaged. — A modest 4.3% volume growth in products means overhead cost increases from suppliers can outpace volume gains and eat into studio margins.
      • • Studios will be able to double their markup on consumables without changing client booking behavior. — The text highlights crowded supplier fields and competitive pricing pressure rather than effortless markup increases.
      • • Consumable costs will permanently outpace service revenue growth, driving studio net income to zero. — Service revenue is growing faster at 7–10%+ CAGR than products at 4.3%, so margin loss occurs through poor cost control rather than inherent market dynamics.
    7. 7. What specific pricing structure does the source recommend for studios operating in high-tourism markets like Thailand or Vietnam?

      • • Maintain a single flat global rate for all clients regardless of piece size or origin to maximize administrative simplicity. — Flat pricing fails to capture tourist willingness to pay while risking pricing out local regular clients.
      • • Offer deep discounts to walk-in tourists while charging domestic clients higher rates to subsidize travel traffic. — This reverses logical market pricing, as tourists possess a higher willingness to pay than local domestic markets.
      • ✓ Implement tiered pricing with accessible domestic rates alongside premium tourist pricing for walk-ins and large custom pieces. — The text specifically recommends tiered rates so tourist willingness to pay is captured without crowding out or alienating local regulars.
      • • Eliminate minimum booking fees during peak seasons to maximize chair turnover for local regulars. — The author explicitly advises setting minimum booking sizes during peak tourist seasons to manage high-demand scheduling.
    8. 8. Based on the source's technical Q&A guidance, under what specific operational condition should a mature U.S. studio consider opening a second location?

      • • As soon as local annual service market growth hits 4.3% CAGR regardless of current shop capacity. — A 4.3% figure refers to product market CAGR and does not reflect necessary studio capacity utilization targets.
      • ✓ Only when the main studio consistently achieves 80–90% chair utilization at peak times with a multi-week waiting list. — The FAQ section advises U.S. studio owners to expand physical overhead only when peak chair utilization hits 80–90% with measurable wait times.
      • • Whenever distributor consolidation lowers the price of needles and furniture by more than 10%. — Distributor consolidation is described as squeezing studio margins rather than significantly lowering shop outfitting costs.
      • • Immediately upon noticing an increase in temporary tattoo sales in nearby urban retail markets. — Temporary tattoo growth is a regional market trend indicator, not a studio-level capacity trigger for opening second physical locations.
    9. 9. How does a 12–13% demand ramp in a tourist hub (e.g., Bangkok or Bali) manifest differently operationally than a 10% demand growth in a mature city?

      • • High tourist hubs experience predictable, long-lead calendar bookings months in advance rather than walk-in traffic. — Tourism-heavy hubs actually experience fast churn, walk-ins, and short-notice bookings compared to mature resident markets.
      • ✓ High tourist hubs see increased walk-ins and short-notice bookings, requiring multi-language support and tiered pricing. — The text explains that rapid growth in tourist hubs creates high walk-in volume and short booking lead times, demanding different operational front-desk tools.
      • • Mature cities face continuous pressure to lower prices due to lower local competition and excess chair availability. — Mature cities face high competition and weekend bottlenecks, driving pressure to raise prices or extend hours rather than discount.
      • • Mature cities rely predominantly on foreign visitor foot traffic to fill weekday morning appointments. — Foreign tourist foot traffic drives hub locations like Bangkok or Bali, whereas mature cities rely more on local demographic expansion.
    10. 10. In 'Patrick's Note,' how should high-volume studios located in the fast-growing Asia-Pacific market leverage their increasing appointment volume?

      • • By simply extending artist working hours without altering existing supplier terms or agreements. — The author explicitly criticizes simply working more hours without addressing underlying supply economics and distributor terms.
      • • By replacing custom permanent work entirely with high-margin temporary cosmetic add-ons. — The text treats temporary products as leading indicators and add-ons, not complete replacements for core studio services.
      • ✓ By using higher consumable volume to negotiate better pricing and rebates from suppliers for specialized needle systems and inks. — Patrick's Note argues that high growth volume gives studios bargaining leverage to demand better pricing, rebates, and tailored supply terms.
      • • By adopting the exact same booking and pricing policies used by shops in Western Europe. — The text warns against applying identical Western European booking and pricing logic to high-volume tourist corridors in Asia.

    Extended Reference Table

    8 of 8 rows

    Extended reference table generated from the article and its verified research sources. Bracketed numbers jump to the matching entry in the Technical References below.

    SafetyItem, Material, or Practice Type or Category Standards, Compliance, or Specification Biocompatibility and Safety Details Usage and Application Source
    ✅Tattooing and Piercing HygieneProcedural StandardBS EN 17169:2020Specifies hygiene, infrastructure, infection control, and cross-contamination prevention to reduce microbial risks.Framework for professional tattoo and piercing studios to ensure client and artist safety., [Inferred]
    ✅Titanium (Implant Grade)MetalASTM F-136; ASTM F-1295; ISO 5832-3Medical grade Ti6Al4V ELI; highly biocompatible, corrosion resistant, and ideal for nickel sensitivity. Can be anodized.Initial body piercings, long-term wear, and medical implants.[9], [Inferred]
    ✅Surgical SteelMetal AlloyASTM F-138; ISO 5832-1; ISO 10993-(6, 10, or 11); EEC Nickel DirectiveLow carbon vacuum melted steel (e.g., 316L) designed to minimize nickel release. Only specific medical grades are biocompatible.Initial piercings, healing tissue, and surgical instruments.[9], [Inferred]
    ✅Tattoo Pigments and InksMaterialREACH Regulation (Annex XVII, Entry 75); Food and Drugs Act (Canada)Restricts over 4,000 hazardous substances; requires compliance with federal cosmetic safety requirements to prevent hypersensitivity.Permanent or semi-permanent dermal pigmentation for body art and makeup.
    ✅NiobiumMetalASTM B392Elemental metal that is highly inert, hypoallergenic, and lacks the implant-grade designation of titanium. Can be anodized black.Body piercing jewelry for individuals with high metal sensitivities.[9], [Inferred]
    ✅Borosilicate / Soda-lime GlassNon-metal MaterialISO 3585; ASTM E438Lead-free, non-porous, and autoclavable. Highly resistant to thermal shock and chemical corrosion.Initial piercings, stretching, retainers, and concealment jewelry.[9], [Inferred]
    ✅Gold (14k or Higher)Precious MetalASTM F2999Must be 14k–18k, nickel-free, and cadmium-free. Higher than 18k is too soft and may harbor bacteria in scratches.High-end body jewelry for initial piercings; must not be plated or filled.[9], [Inferred]
    ✅Commercially Pure TitaniumMetalASTM F-67; ISO 5832-2Unalloyed titanium with excellent tissue compatibility and corrosion resistance; lightweight and nickel-free.Initial piercings and medical implants.[9], [Inferred]

    Free Body Art Wall Posters

    Print-ready reference posters for your studio or your own wall. Free to download and display, embed on your own site with attribution. Click any poster to preview it full size before downloading.

    Choose and download all 40 posters

    Technical_References_Archive

    About the Author

    PP

    Patrick Poli

    Chief Engineer, Poli International · Creator of BioFlex® body jewelry

    Patrick has spent 25+ years manufacturing body jewellery and studio equipment, and is the creator of BioFlex® body jewelry. He founded Poli International with his son Frédéric to work on recyclable and bio-friendly materials for tattoo and piercing. He also made custom titanium body jewellery in metric sizes the market still does not offer, because manufacturers stop at 2 mm steps and a piercing rarely fits a round number.

    More about Patrick →

    Last reviewed: 2026-10-03 · Published: 2026-08-19

    Continue Reading