Creep and Stress Relaxation in Polymer Body Jewelry: Why Flexible Materials Lose Their Shape
Key Takeaways:
» Polymers are viscoelastic: they deform with time, not just with load, so a flexi post or o-ring that fits today can fit differently in six months
» Creep is time-dependent strain under constant stress; it is why polymer barbells and retainers permanently stretch or bend
» Stress relaxation is the same physics seen from the other side: an o-ring or gasket loses tension while held at constant deformation
» Crosslink density, molecular weight, and operating temperature determine how fast a polymer creeps
Time is part of the material
Metals obey Hooke's law to a first approximation: apply a stress, get an immediate strain, and the strain stays until the stress is removed. Polymers do not behave that way. Between the elastic response of a spring and the viscous response of a fluid sits the viscoelastic regime, and body jewelry polymers operate squarely inside it.
Every polymer jewelry item is time-dependent. A BioFlex flexi post, a silicone o-ring, a PTFE retainer, an acrylic taper, all respond to load in two stages: an instantaneous elastic component, then a slow deformation that depends on how long the load has been applied. A polymer part is never fully characterized by a single number such as Shore hardness or tensile strength.
Two phenomena dominate long-term behavior: creep and stress relaxation. They are the same molecular physics viewed from different boundary conditions, and understanding both explains the most common field complaint about flexible jewelry: it loses its shape.
Creep: permanent deformation under constant load
Creep is the increase in strain over time when a polymer is held under a constant stress. The barbell in a healed piercing carries a steady, low-level load from tissue pressure, gravity, and ornament weight. Over weeks and months, the polymer chains slowly rearrange, and the material elongates in the direction of the stress.
The creep curve for a semicrystalline polymer such as polypropylene random copolymer, the BioFlex base, has three stages. Primary creep is fast and decelerating, driven by chain uncoiling. Secondary creep is the long plateau where strain accumulates slowly and steadily; this is the regime most jewelry spends its service life in. Tertiary creep is accelerating deformation that ends in rupture, which is why a flexi post carrying a heavy ornament for a year can suddenly snap without warning.
Creep is not recoverable by unloading: some deformation is viscous flow, and viscous flow is permanent. An acrylic taper that has crept under insertion stress will not spring back, and a polymer barbell that has elongated will not shorten again. ISO 899-1 for tensile creep and ASTM D2990 for flexural creep quantify this behavior by holding a specimen at constant load and recording strain against time.
Stress relaxation: why o-rings lose tension
Stress relaxation is creep's mirror image. Instead of holding the load constant and watching strain increase, the part is held at constant deformation while the resisting force decays. A silicone o-ring stretched around a barbell post, a polymer gasket compressed between two pieces, a flexi post bent into a fixed curve, all are held at constant strain. Over time, the chains redistribute stress internally, and the force the part exerts on its surroundings drops.
This is the mechanism behind the complaint that polymer o-rings and gaskets loosen. The o-ring is not wearing away, it is relaxing. The loss of tension follows an approximately logarithmic curve, fast in the first hours and slower afterward, which is why a new o-ring feels tight and loose a week later.
Crosslink density and molecular weight: the design levers
Not all polymers creep at the same rate, and the differences are controllable at the molecular level. Three variables dominate.
Crosslink density is the strongest lever. In a thermoset elastomer such as medical-grade silicone (PDMS), crosslinks are permanent chemical bonds between chains. Higher crosslink density means chains cannot slide past one another easily, so creep and stress relaxation slow dramatically. This is why Shore hardness and creep resistance track together in silicone: a harder durometer is, in effect, a more heavily crosslinked network with less viscous flow. The trade-off is flexibility.
Molecular weight matters for thermoplastics. Long chains form entanglements that act as temporary crosslinks, and higher molecular weight means more entanglements per chain. Polypropylene random copolymer with adequate molecular weight creeps far less than a low-molecular-weight grade.
Temperature is the third lever, and it acts exponentially. Creep rate rises steeply as the operating temperature approaches the polymer's glass transition or melting range. A polymer part worn against the body sits at roughly 32-37 °C, warm enough to matter: the same material will creep measurably faster in an earlobe than on a shelf.
What a jewelry specification should actually state
A specification that only names the material and Shore hardness is incomplete. The properties that predict long-term fit are time-dependent, so the specification should state them that way.
For a flexi post or retainer, the useful number is the creep strain at a defined stress and temperature after a defined period, for example percent elongation at 1 MPa and 37 °C after 1,000 hours, tested to ISO 899-1. For an o-ring or sealing component, the useful number is the percent retained force after a defined relaxation period, tested at the actual service strain. For any polymer that will be sterilized, note that sterilization cycles alter the molecular structure and shift the creep and relaxation behavior; the sterilization and polymer degradation article covers that interaction.
If a client reports that a polymer piece has stretched, loosened, or changed fit over months of wear, that is not a manufacturing defect. Choosing a crosslinked elastomer for sealing roles, specifying adequate molecular weight for thermoplastics, and accounting for body temperature in the design separate a part that holds its shape from one that does not. The material certification checker and the polymer science wiki cover the documentation side.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does my silicone o-ring keep loosening?
The o-ring is not wearing away, it is stress relaxing. Held at constant stretch, the polymer chains redistribute internal stress over time, and the force the ring exerts drops on an approximately logarithmic curve. Specify the retained force after relaxation, not the initial force, and use a higher durometer silicone if tension loss is a problem.
Can a polymer barbell stretch permanently?
Yes. Under the constant low load of tissue pressure and ornament weight, a thermoplastic such as polypropylene random copolymer undergoes creep. The early stages are partly recoverable, but the viscous component is permanent.
Why does acrylic jewelry change shape but BioFlex does not?
Acrylic (PMMA) is an amorphous thermoplastic with no crosslinks and no crystalline phase, so its chains slide past one another readily under load and temperature. Polypropylene random copolymer has a crystalline fraction that acts as physical crosslinks, slowing creep.
Does body temperature make polymer jewelry deform faster?
Yes. Chain segment mobility increases with temperature, and creep rate rises steeply as the operating temperature approaches the polymer's glass transition or melting range. Jewelry worn at 32-37 °C creeps measurably faster than the same material stored at room temperature.
References
1. ISO 899-1:2017. Plastics. Determination of creep behaviour. Part 1: Tensile creep. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2017.
2. ASTM D2990-17. Standard Test Methods for Tensile, Compressive, and Flexural Creep and Creep-Rupture of Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017.
3. Ferry JD. Viscoelastic Properties of Polymers. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1980.
4. Callister WD, Rethwisch DG. Materials Science and Engineering: An Introduction. 10th ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2018.
5. Schneider F, et al. Mechanical properties of silicones for MEMS. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering. 2008;18(6):065008.


